First, I will tie free will to moral responsibility. Then I will give an overview of compatibilism with specific examples. After that, I will argue that it’s not worth accepting because it’s evasive and doesn’t line up with our idea of freedom. Then I will move on to give an overview of libertarianism with specific examples. After that, I will argue that it’s not worth accepting because it is convoluted and magical. Then I will give an overview of hard determinism with give specific examples. After that, I will argue that it’s worth accepting because neuroscience shows that most actions arise from the unconscious mind which we have no direct access to or control over. Then I will use Smilansky’s argument that a hard determinist morality is purer than a compatibilist or a libertarian morality. Furthermore, human freedom is further restricted because many patterns of thought are hardwired. After that, I will tie neuroscience to morality. Then I will argue that morality is possible without moral responsibility. Finally, I will defend hard determinism against some standard objections.